Recent strike action led a hospital trust to cancel more than 6,500 appointments – and delays to cancer treatment are now a significant concern.
The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust reported that cancer treatment “continues to be significantly affected by industrial action” as clinicians are diverted to urgent and emergency care during strikes.
The strikes are also hitting the trust’s finances, which are £26.1 million in the red – £9.5 million more than expected.
As well Royal Free Hospital in Camden, the NHS trust manages Barnet Hospital, Edgware Community Hospital and Chase Farm Hospital in Enfield.
NHS staff have staged a series of walkouts this year over pay and working conditions. The latest strike by junior doctors took place from July 13 to 18, followed by a 48-hour strike by consultants from July 20 to 22.
A further junior doctors strike is due to take place from August 11 to 15.
Details of the impact of strikes to date were presented to a meeting of the trust’s board last Wednesday (July 26). Chief executive Peter Landstrom told the meeting strike action was “having its toll”. He added: “Over the last period of industrial action, we as a trust had to cancel over 6,500 patient appointments.
READ MORE:
- Best and worst GPs in and around Hampstead and Highgate, according to patients
- Barnet's best and worst GP surgeries as rated by patients
“We worked incredibly hard to rebook them all, but obviously that is a vast number, and we are starting to see this come through now in terms of some of the pressures on our overall numbers of patients waiting for elective care, including some cancer patients as well. We are obviously really concerned about that and responding to it.”
A report presented to the board meeting revealed that in May, before the latest round of industrial action, 42.9% of the trust’s patients were treated within 62 days of an urgent GP referral for cancer – well below the 85% NHS standard. It means Royal Free London ranked 112th out of 120 trusts for this.
The number of patients waiting longer than 62 days for cancer treatment increased from 386 in April to 418 in May, figures show.
Performance against the faster diagnosis standard also declined in May, with 66.7% of patients diagnosed or having cancer ruled out within 28 days of being referred for suspected cancer, compared to 69.5% the previous month.
Mr Landstrom told the meeting that the loss of capacity caused by the strikes was “really starting to impact”, with “a growing number of patients that will need treatment”, adding that the trust will need to reprioritise theatre capacity and our resources to support some of that surgery”.
Peter noted that there had been improvements in some areas – particularly in urgent and emergency care, where all of the departments performed “above their recovery trajectories”.
Barnet Hospital has moved from one of the lowest-performing emergency units in London to above average, he explained.
During a separate update, the trust’s chief finance officer, Vicky Clarke, said £1.4m of its deficit was caused by a breakdown in its power plant, meaning it had to buy energy on the open market.
She added that strike-related costs totalled £2.4m – partly caused by paying “additional premiums to provide safe cover during that time” – although this would change as the government had already agreed funding to cover some industrial action.
Sickness rates had also increased as staff worked longer hours to cover strikes, she added.
A further strain on finances is being caused by capacity issues preventing private treatment from returning to pre-pandemic levels. Vicky said it would be a “challenge” to identify further savings but insisted that “they do exist”, and the trust was working on efficiencies in several areas.
She pointed out that if strike days were excluded, the trust’s elective recovery plan – designed to tackle backlogs in patient care caused by the Covid-19 pandemic – was ahead of schedule.
Group chair Mark Lam noted that the trust would work on “transforming our care and not cost-cutting” to improve performance.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here